Re: Mercedes Benz Durability for the Record
From: Jim Conforti (lndshrkxmission.com)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
At 09:56 AM 4/14/2009, LS wrote:

For some reason, the public isn't getting this message though.

I just spoke with an enthusiastic E92 M3 owner last week. He also has an E39 M5 and openly admitted that it's had a lot of repairs (VANOS, front control arms, assorted electrical glitches, clutch problems) all after only 85k miles. He chalks up the design deficiencies as "maintenance". He bought it because of various E30 and E34 BMWs he's had. He asked me about my CTS-V and without hesitation commented that he wouldn't buy American because of a bad experience with a 1989 Pontiac Sunbird.

  Lash,

  I think that the message gets muddled because of the company.

  GM is a mess.

  I don't mean the bailouts and political stuff.

  I mean the customer service.

  My family was a strict GM family for years.

  So I've owned lots of "crap" - I also bought 3 recent Corvettes

  2 C5 Z06s  and 1 C6 Z06.

  The customer service I received from GM when I had problems
  w/ my C6 Z06 were enough for me to say "never again".

  If I wasn't "in the industry" and happened to have a friend who
  had connections high up in the Chevrolet division, I would have
  been stuck with a car that was damaged in shipment and now modified
  so as to be (IMNSHO) unsafe in a crash.

  In essence, GM said "f**k you - you'll take what we give you!"

  Sorry, not me boss.

  The call me Land SHARK for a reason.

  So is GM's production quality overall gone up?  yup.

  Has GM's customer service gone up along w/ prices/etc.  nope.

  GM continues to "sail the FAILBOAT".

  They deserve to be split up into individual divisions and those
  that can survive in TODAY's marketplace will - the rest - adios.

  Jim Conforti

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.